Exposes the pathological arguments of apologists for the retraction of the Séralini study which showed the toxic dangers of Monsanto’s GMO maize.
Shows how accusing people of Internet trolling can be a form of trolling itself which is meant to halt discussion of heretical ideas.
Examines the difference between faith-based pathological skepticism and evidence-based healthy skepticism.
Show the ubiquity of pathological skepticism and how the vast majority of us have limits to which of our beliefs we will objectively examine.
Review of Steven Novella’s article on the characteristics of pseudo-science.