Did you know that 100% of competent honest scientists have formed a consensus that the official story of what happened on 9/11 is entirely unsupported pseudo-science nonsense? It’s true. The problem is that very few of those scientists publicly proclaim […]
Continue reading »Category: Articles
Original articles relating to pathological skepticism.
Is Building 7 a 9/11 Honeypot?
In 2011 two of among the most respected members of the scientific 9/11 truth community, David Chandler and Jonathon Cole, issued a joint statement relating to the damage incurred to the Pentagon on 9/11, 2001.[1] They eloquently made the case […]
Continue reading »The Mainstream Media: Aiding and Abetting the 9/11 Fraud
Generally speaking, journalism is supposed to follow certain ethical standards when gathering news and dispensing that news to the public. These standards involve the principles of truthfulness, accuracy, objectivity, impartiality, fairness and public accountability.[1][2][3][4] Does the mainstream media’s treatment of […]
Continue reading »How I Survived Debates with Two Official 9/11 Story Believers
This spring I was able to secure two online debates with official 9/11 story believers. One with Dave Thomas of New Mexicans for Science and Reason starting in April[1] and the other in June with Dr. Steven Novella of “The […]
Continue reading »A Scientific Theory of the Twin Tower Collapses
Official 9/11 story believers continue the odd tactic of demanding a thorough explanation from 9/11 skeptics as to what we think happened that day. I have attempted this previously for the WTC 7 collapse. Now I’ll attempt to do this […]
Continue reading »Are You as Smart as a Fifth Grade Science Student? The 9/11 Test
Are you smarter than a fifth grade science student? Starting in kindergarten, students are taught that the best explanation for something is the explanation that has the most supporting evidence. When you have two competing explanations you are supposed to […]
Continue reading »Faith-Based vs Evidence-Based Skepticism
A good way to understand the difference between pathological skepticism and healthy skepticism is to look at it in terms of how the skepticism is based. Pathological skepticism is based on faith. Healthy skepticism is based on evidence. Evidence in […]
Continue reading »Séralini Study Fuelling Fear of ‘Frankenfood’ Retracted
The pseudo-skeptic blogosphere was abuzz in celebrative glory after a damning study to Monsanto’s GMO corn was recently retracted.[1] The same irrelevant talking points were repeated again and again. See the following for a few examples: Sharon Hill at “Doubtful […]
Continue reading »Thought Terminating Trolls
Imagine a violent neo-nazi skinhead spewing profanity-laced anti-Jewish statements on a Jewish Holocaust remembrance forum. Internet trolls are a serious problem. Putting it simply, Internet trolls are people that deliberately post offensive comments on-line with the sole intention of upsetting […]
Continue reading »Is True Skepticism Possible?
Several months ago I’ve had a very disturbing revelation. I used to think I was a true skeptic but now I know that I’m not. I’m not sure it’s even possible for anyone to really be a true skeptic. This […]
Continue reading »